Opinion
No. C-75-09-3000, CA 5958
Argued July 21, 1976.
Remanded for resentencing August 16, 1976. Reconsideration denied September 15, 1976. Petition for review denied October 19, 1976.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.
Charles S. Crookham, Judge.
Glenn H. Prohaska, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Day and Prohaska, P.C., Portland.
W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.
Remanded for resentencing.
SCHWAB, C. J.
Defendant was convicted of attempted sodomy in the first degree, ORS 161.405(1), ORS 163.405, and was placed on probation. One of the conditions of the probation order was that defendant pay $3,000 as "restitution" to the victim. This represents a sum greater than any expenses involved.
"(1) A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime when he intentionally engages in conduct which constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime." ORS 161.405.
"(1) A person who engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another person or causes another to engage in deviate sexual intercourse commits the crime of sodomy in the first degree if:
"(a) The victim is subjected to forcible compulsion by the actor * * *.
"* * * * *." ORS 163.405.
On appeal defendant makes two assignments of error. The first — that there was no evidence of attempted "forcible compulsion" — is contrary to the record. The second — that the court exceeded its authority in directing the defendant to pay $3,000 to the victim — is correct. State v. Stalheim, 275 Or. 683, 552 P.2d 829 (1976).
Remanded for resentencing.