From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Urena

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 10, 2015
164 So. 3d 829 (La. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2014–K–1603.

04-10-2015

STATE of Louisiana v. Walter URENA.


Opinion

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

I concur in the denial of this writ application. I write separately to caution prosecutors against relying on generic charges in an indictment, because such charges could compromise the defendant's due process rights. See, e.g., Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 763, 82 S.Ct. 1038, 8 L.Ed.2d 240 (1962) (due process requires that an indictment “sufficiently apprises the defendant of what he must be prepared to meet”); Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 117, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974) (an indictment is sufficient if it enables a defendant “to plead an acquittal or conviction in bar of future prosecutions for the same offense”).


Summaries of

State v. Urena

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 10, 2015
164 So. 3d 829 (La. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Urena

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Walter URENA.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Apr 10, 2015

Citations

164 So. 3d 829 (La. 2015)