Opinion
No. S-03-635.
2006.
Appellee's motion for summary affirmance is denied. However, based upon appellant's representation in his written objection to such motion that in this postconviction action, he is alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in a prior postconviction appeal, the court determines on its own motion that no error of law appears and that a detailed opinion would have no precedential value. See, State v. Dandridge, 264 Neb. 707, 651 N.W.2d 567 (2002), and State v. Hunt, 262 Neb. 648, 634 N.W.2d 475 (2001) (holding that there is no constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel in postconviction action); State v. Loner, 266 Neb. 245, 664 N.W.2d 892 (2003) (holding that for postconviction relief to be granted under Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3001 to 29-3004 (Reissue 1995), claimed infringement must be constitutional in dimension). Affirmed. See rule 7A(1).