From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Trahan

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 16, 2018
No. 2016-KP-2083 (La. Apr. 16, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2016-KP-2083

04-16-2018

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DARYL TRAHAN


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE , would grant and assigns reasons.

While there is no dispute that the trial court did not advise the defendant of his Boykin rights during the plea colloquy, I find his guilty pleas were knowingly and voluntarily entered into. The defendant was advised by his attorney of the rights he was waiving, and he expressly maintained throughout the proceedings that he desired to plead guilty and avoid trial. The trial court's failure to advise the defendant of his rights does not alone discharge the defendant's burden in post-conviction proceedings of showing, as a basis for vacating his convictions, a constitutional defect in his guilty pleas. See La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.2, see also State v. Harris, 97-1352, pp. 1-2 (La. 10/31/97), 702 So.2d 678-79. Accordingly, I would reverse the court of appeal and reinstate the defendant's convictions and sentences.


Summaries of

State v. Trahan

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 16, 2018
No. 2016-KP-2083 (La. Apr. 16, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Trahan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DARYL TRAHAN

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 16, 2018

Citations

No. 2016-KP-2083 (La. Apr. 16, 2018)