From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Hawai‘i.
Jun 1, 2020
464 P.3d 286 (Haw. 2020)

Summary

In State v. Thompson, this court rejected the defendant's argument that the law of the case doctrine precluded the circuit court from imposing consecutive sentences upon resentencing, where the "original judge had imposed concurrent, not consecutive, sentences."

Summary of this case from State v. Preble

Opinion

SCWC-17-0000427

06-01-2020

STATE of Hawai‘i, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James THOMPSON, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

Jon N. Ikenaga for petitioner/defendant-appellant Loren J. Thomas for respondent/plaintiff-appellee


SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER

Affirmed. Vacate. Remand.


Summaries of

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Hawai‘i.
Jun 1, 2020
464 P.3d 286 (Haw. 2020)

In State v. Thompson, this court rejected the defendant's argument that the law of the case doctrine precluded the circuit court from imposing consecutive sentences upon resentencing, where the "original judge had imposed concurrent, not consecutive, sentences."

Summary of this case from State v. Preble
Case details for

State v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Hawai‘i, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James THOMPSON…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Jun 1, 2020

Citations

464 P.3d 286 (Haw. 2020)

Citing Cases

State v. Preble

(1) On June 16, 2021, this court issued its Memorandum Opinion in this appeal. The conclusion of the…

State v. Preble

In this appeal, Preble contends that the circuit court erred in imposing consecutive rather than concurrent…