From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 9, 2016
2016-UP-467 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2016)

Opinion

2016-UP-467

11-09-2016

The State, Respondent, v. Clarence Keith Thomas, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2015-002508

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Clarence Keith Thomas, pro se, for Appellant. General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2016

Appeal From Spartanburg County Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge. Appeal Dismissed

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Clarence Keith Thomas, pro se, for Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A. J, concur


Summaries of

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 9, 2016
2016-UP-467 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Clarence Keith Thomas, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

2016-UP-467 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2016)