From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Theve

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Clermont County
Feb 13, 2006
2006 Ohio 599 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. CA2005-05-039.

February 13, 2006.

Criminal Appeal from Clermont County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 04-CR-00371.

Donald W. White, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, David H. Hoffmann, 123 N. Third Street, Batavia, OH 45103-3033, for plaintiff-appellee.

David M. Hunter, P.O. Box 558, Milford, OH 45150, for defendant-appellant.


DECISION


{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Jeffrey Carl Theve, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

Walsh, P.J., Young and Bbessler, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Theve

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Clermont County
Feb 13, 2006
2006 Ohio 599 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Theve

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Carl Theve…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Clermont County

Date published: Feb 13, 2006

Citations

2006 Ohio 599 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)