rejecting the defendant's argument that the trial court erred "in refusing to instruct the jury on the definition of a reckless state of mind," where the jury was properly instructed as to the applicable states of mind for unlawful entry into a motor vehicle — intentionally or knowingly
Summary of this case from State v. ValorosoNo. 29302.
October 29, 2009.
Summary Dispositional Orders, Affirmed.
rejecting the defendant's argument that the trial court erred "in refusing to instruct the jury on the definition of a reckless state of mind," where the jury was properly instructed as to the applicable states of mind for unlawful entry into a motor vehicle — intentionally or knowingly
Summary of this case from State v. ValorosoFull title:State v. Tengbergen
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Oct 29, 2009
Indeed, this court has rejected similar arguments before. See, e.g., State v. Pattioay, No. CAAP-17-0000465,…