State v. Tejeda

Full title: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CELSO LARIOS TEJEDA, Appellant

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 12, 1992

826 P.2d 26 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

826 P.2d 26

Opinion

89-CR-0032; CA A63948

Argued and submitted April 1, 1991

Affirmed February 12, 1992

Appeal from Circuit Court, Josephine County.

Gerald C. Neufeld, Judge.

Beecher C. Ellison, Grants Pass, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Kengla, Sybrant, Browne Ellison, Grants Pass.

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge,^_ and Deits, Judge.

_ Joseph, C.J., vice Newman, J., deceased.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendant's probation was revoked, because he had been convicted of possession of cocaine in another case. See State v. Tejeda (A63949), 111 Or. App. 201, 826 P.2d 25 (1992). He contends that he is not guilty of that charge and that, therefore, his probation was improperly revoked. He is wrong.

Affirmed.