State v. Teasley

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Travis Teasley, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 22, 2012

Appellate Case No. 2011-184486 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-184486 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-493

08-22-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Travis Teasley, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Pickens County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed¹ pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge. . . . A party may not argue one ground at trial and an alternate ground on appeal.").

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.