From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Surdak

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 31, 2018
2018-UP-043 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-043

01-31-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Donald Robert Surdak, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000409

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2018

Appeal From Anderson County J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Surdak

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 31, 2018
2018-UP-043 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Surdak

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Donald Robert Surdak, Jr., Appellant. Appellate…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 31, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-043 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2018)