From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Summers

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Dec 31, 1990
71 Ohio App. 3d 1 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

holding that court costs were not part of criminal sentence, and that non payment of those costs did not result in sentence not being served

Summary of this case from State v. Hoover

Opinion

No. 59927.

Decided December 31, 1990.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County.

John T. Corrigan, Prosecuting Attorney, and L. Christopher Frey, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Richard M. Summers, for appellee.


Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio (the "state"), appeals from the trial court's granting of defendant-appellee Gary Summers' application for expungement. Specifically, the state argues defendant was not entitled to expungement of his record because he had not complied with the trial court's order requiring defendant to pay court costs. Hence, defendant had not completed his sentence, was not discharged for purposes of R.C. 2953.32(A), and was not entitled to the granting of his application for expungement.

The state relies on this court's decision in State v. Braun (July 7, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 46082, unreported, 1983 WL 5542, wherein we held that the defendant was not entitled to expungement of his record because he failed to pay his fine, thereby not completing his sentence. However, in this case, the state argues defendant did not pay his court costs. Court costs are not a part of a fine. Cincinnati v. Wright (1945), 77 Ohio App. 261, 268, 33 O.O. 23, 26-27, 67 N.E.2d 358, 362. Moreover, "[t]he duty to pay court costs is a civil obligation arising from an implied contract." Strattman v. Studt (1969), 20 Ohio St.2d 95, 49 O.O.2d 428, 253 N.E.2d 749, paragraph six of the syllabus.

Hence, court costs are not a part of a criminal sentence. Therefore, defendant's failure to pay the court costs does not result in his sentence not being served. As such, the record indicates he was entitled to the granting of his application for expungement.

Accordingly, the state's assignment of error is overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

PATTON, C.J., JOHN V. CORRIGAN and FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Summers

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Dec 31, 1990
71 Ohio App. 3d 1 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)

holding that court costs were not part of criminal sentence, and that non payment of those costs did not result in sentence not being served

Summary of this case from State v. Hoover
Case details for

State v. Summers

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellant, v. SUMMERS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Dec 31, 1990

Citations

71 Ohio App. 3d 1 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)
592 N.E.2d 905

Citing Cases

State v. Ushery

The issue remaining is whether Ushery's failure to pay the court costs precluded a finding that Ushery had…

State v. Hoover

See State v. Jordan, 10th Dist. No. 07AP-584, 2007-Ohio-6383, ¶ 6; State v. Wainwright, 75 Ohio App.3d 793…