From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sullivan

Connecticut Supreme Court
Dec 5, 2023
348 Conn. 927 (Conn. 2023)

Opinion

12-05-2023

STATE of Connecticut v. Casey Liem SULLIVAN

Trent A. LaLima, Hartford, and Virginia M. Gillette, in support of the petition. Jonathan M. Sousa, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.


Trent A. LaLima, Hartford, and Virginia M. Gillette, in support of the petition.

Jonathan M. Sousa, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

The defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 220 Conn. App. 403, 298 A.3d 1238, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the prosecutor’s rebuttal argument did not constitute prosecutorial impropriety that deprived the defendant of a fair trial?"


Summaries of

State v. Sullivan

Connecticut Supreme Court
Dec 5, 2023
348 Conn. 927 (Conn. 2023)
Case details for

State v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Casey Liem SULLIVAN

Court:Connecticut Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 5, 2023

Citations

348 Conn. 927 (Conn. 2023)
305 A.3d 631

Citing Cases

State v. Purvis

(Emphasis in original.) State v. Sullivan, 220 Conn.App. 403, 429, 298 A.3d 1238, cert. granted, 348 Conn.…