From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sturgill

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 1992
840 P.2d 112 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

90-21134; CA A71575

Argued and submitted August 28, 1992

Condition of probation vacated; otherwise affirmed November 12, 1992

Appeal from District Court, Lane County.

W.K. Liepe, Judge.

Dan Maloney, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.


Jail confinement as a condition of probation vacated; otherwise affirmed. State v. Brown, 115 Or. App. 327, 838 P.2d 624 (1992); State v. Harding, 116 Or. App. 29, 840 P.2d 113 (1992).


Summaries of

State v. Sturgill

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 1992
840 P.2d 112 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Sturgill

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DEAN ANTHONY STURGILL, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 12, 1992

Citations

840 P.2d 112 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
840 P.2d 112