From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Straughn

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 2006
850 N.E.2d 73 (Ohio 2006)

Opinion

2005-0585.

July 5, 2006.

Hamilton App. No. C-040093. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174.


On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The order affirming the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals that modified the defendant's sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

PFEIFER, O'CONNOR and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

State v. Straughn

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 2006
850 N.E.2d 73 (Ohio 2006)
Case details for

State v. Straughn

Case Details

Full title:State v. Straughn

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 5, 2006

Citations

850 N.E.2d 73 (Ohio 2006)
850 N.E.2d 73
2006 Ohio 3306

Citing Cases

State v. Porter

courts have found that a defendant is at fault in creating the situation giving rise to the affray or…

State v. Ellis

Indeed, a multitude of courts have found that a defendant is at fault in creating the situation giving rise…