From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Strahan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 21, 1977
348 So. 2d 79 (La. 1977)

Opinion

No. 60311.

July 21, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for remedial writs


Writ granted. The reasons assigned by the trial judge for his ruling are incorrect. After claiming his legal rights, a defendant may change his mind, waive his rights, and make a voluntary statement. See State v. Peevy, La., 321 So.2d 324 (1975); State v. Law, 214 Kan. 643, 522 P.2d 320; Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975). Moreover, we do not interpret the affidavit, the sole basis for the ruling, as an immediate request for counsel. Hence, we reverse the ruling and remand the case to the trial court for reconsideration of the question of whether the statement was freely and voluntarily made after a waiver of Miranda rights based on all the evidence.

SUMMERS, J., concurs, on the sole basis that the ruling of the trial judge is erroneous and should be reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Strahan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 21, 1977
348 So. 2d 79 (La. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Strahan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. MICHAEL K. STRAHAN

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jul 21, 1977

Citations

348 So. 2d 79 (La. 1977)

Citing Cases

State v. Hebert

The Louisiana Supreme Court relied upon Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975),…

State v. Gaspard

. . . Nothing in Miranda prevents an accused party from changing his mind and giving a statement after he has…