From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 5, 2000
255 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2000)

Opinion

Decided December 5, 2000


The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 301 (AC 18813), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the facts of this case, the trial court's failure to give a `no unfavorable inference' instruction was plain error requiring reversal of the conviction?

"2. Is the failure to include such an instruction subject to harmless error analysis?"

It is further ordered that the trial court articulate the facts concerning discussions, if any, among the state's attorney, defense counsel and the court during a charging conference, relative to the court's giving a "no unfavorable inference" instruction to the jury in this matter.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16436.

Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Richard E. Condon, Jr., special deputy assistant public defender, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 5, 2000
255 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v . GLENN STEWART

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 5, 2000

Citations

255 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2000)
763 A.2d 1039

Citing Cases

State v. Stewart

This case returns to the Appellate Court on remand from our Supreme Court. State v. Stewart, 255 Conn. 913,…

State v. Ruocco

Because the complete jury charge is found in the transcript, the record is sufficient to review a claim of…