From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Steward

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Mar 4, 2003
97 S.W.3d 7 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 80637

October 29, 2002 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 14, 2003 Application for Transfer Denied march 4, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; William M. Corrigan, Judge.

Rosalynn Koch, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asstt. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and Mary K. Hoff and George W. Draper III, JJ.



ORDER


Defendant, Andria Steward, appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury for three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062, RSMo 2000; one count of statutory rape in the first degree, Section 566.032, RSMo 2000; and one count of incest, Section 568.020, RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced, as a prior offender, to three concurrent terms of twenty years' imprisonment for the statutory sodomy counts, a consecutive term of twenty years for the statutory rape count, and a concurrent term of five years for the incest count. Defendant contends the trial court erred in (1) overruling Defendant's motion for continuance, (2) submitting instructions that failed to follow the pattern instructions, and (3) overruling Defendant's objection to the State's argument concerning a prior conviction. In a fourth point, Defendant also asserts the trial court plainly erred in allowing the State to argue that had Defendant possessed evidence contradicting the victim's account, Defendant would have introduced such evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Steward

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Mar 4, 2003
97 S.W.3d 7 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Steward

Case Details

Full title:State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Andria Steward…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Mar 4, 2003

Citations

97 S.W.3d 7 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)