From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Stegall

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jul 17, 1990
792 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

Nos. 55502, 57219.

July 17, 1990.

APPEAL FROM THE MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT, PERRY COUNTY; KENNETH W. PRATTE AND STANLEY J. MURPHY, JUDGES.

Susan L. Hogan, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.

William Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.


ORDER


Movant filed notice of direct appeal, but has raised no points in that appeal; therefore, he has abandoned it. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Stegall

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jul 17, 1990
792 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Stegall

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TIMOTHY STEGALL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jul 17, 1990

Citations

792 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)