From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Steele

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 15, 2017
327 Conn. 962 (Conn. 2017)

Summary

holding vacatur of lesser conspiracy offense, rather than merger, was proper remedy in case involving multiple punishments for cumulative conspiracy convictions arising from single agreement

Summary of this case from State v. Fox

Opinion

11-15-2017

STATE of Connecticut v. Thomas STEELE

James B. Streeto, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Rocco A. Chiarenza, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


James B. Streeto, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Rocco A. Chiarenza, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 176 Conn.App. 1, 169 A.3d 797 (2017), is denied.

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Steele

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 15, 2017
327 Conn. 962 (Conn. 2017)

holding vacatur of lesser conspiracy offense, rather than merger, was proper remedy in case involving multiple punishments for cumulative conspiracy convictions arising from single agreement

Summary of this case from State v. Fox
Case details for

State v. Steele

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Thomas STEELE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 15, 2017

Citations

327 Conn. 962 (Conn. 2017)
172 A.3d 1261

Citing Cases

State v. Turner

Weaver also took screenshots of the video at different times between approximately 3:24 p.m. and 5:08 p.m. on…

State v. Rogers

Pastore, however, indicated that he did not have an objection to the admissibility of Weaver's PowerPoint…