From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sroka

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 21, 1976
267 S.C. 664 (S.C. 1976)

Summary

holding appellant's guilt was conclusively shown by the record and any doubt about correctness of guilt was eliminated by the admission of appellant in open court, after conviction and during the presentence inquiry by the trial judge, that the appellant had participated in the robbery

Summary of this case from State v. Wiley

Opinion

20331

December 21, 1976.

Messrs. Barry Krell and Ray P. McClain, of Charleston, for Appellant. Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., Joseph R. Barker and Robert N. Wells, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., of Columbia, and Robert B. Wallace, Sol., of Charleston, for Respondent.


December 21, 1976.


Appellant, James Sroka, and a codefendant were convicted of armed robbery of the manager of Doscher's Red and White Store in Charleston County, and each sentenced to prison terms. Only Sroka has appealed. Judgment is affirmed.

Appellant charges that the trial judge erred (1) in refusing to permit cross-examination of a key State's witness concerning the prior conviction of the witness for possession of stimulant drugs without a prescription; (2) in refusing to grant certain requested charges to the jury; (3) in refusing to grant a mistrial because of testimony concerning an alleged prejudicial declaration of the codefendant; and (4) in allowing the entire trial transcript to be included in the Transcript of Record.

We affirm because the guilt of the appellant is conclusively shown by the record and any alleged error could not have been prejudicial. Any doubt about the correctness of this conclusion is eliminated by the admission of appellant in open court, after conviction and during the pre-sentence inquiry by the trial judge, that he had participated in the robbery with a sawed-off shotgun. Further review of the record, therefore, is rendered unnecessary. State v. Key, 256 S.C. 90, 180 S.E.2d 888; State v. Miller, 266 S.C. 409, 223 S.E.2d 774.

Judgment affirmed.

LITTLEJOHN, NESS, RHODES and GREGORY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Sroka

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 21, 1976
267 S.C. 664 (S.C. 1976)

holding appellant's guilt was conclusively shown by the record and any doubt about correctness of guilt was eliminated by the admission of appellant in open court, after conviction and during the presentence inquiry by the trial judge, that the appellant had participated in the robbery

Summary of this case from State v. Wiley

affirming guilty verdict by jury based on overwhelming evidence presented at trial and later admission of guilt by defendant in open court

Summary of this case from State v. Passaro
Case details for

State v. Sroka

Case Details

Full title:The STATE, Respondent, v. James SROKA, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 21, 1976

Citations

267 S.C. 664 (S.C. 1976)
230 S.E.2d 816

Citing Cases

Brown v. Warden of Kershaw Corr. Inst.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Weston, 367 S.C. 279,…

Whetsell v. State

This rule applies to the claim that counsel was ineffective. Furthermore, review of a trial error is…