From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Spears

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
Nov 13, 1963
374 S.W.2d 250 (Tex. Civ. App. 1963)

Opinion

No. 6643.

November 7, 1963. Remittitur Filed November 13, 1963.

Appeal from the County Court, Jefferson County, George Buford, J.

W. G. Walley, Jr., A. L. Vickers, A. L. Vickers, of counsel, Beaumont, for appellant.

Black Provost, Port Arthur, for appellees.


This is an eminent domain case brought by the State of Texas to acquire a strip of land for highway right-of-way purposes. This was a partial taking case and the only points involved are in connection with the value of the remainder after the taking. The State contends this finding of the jury is supported by no evidence and that such finding is against the overwhelming weight and preponderance of the evidence.

The jury found, the market value of the remainder, after taking, to be $8,905.00. Four expert witnesses testified, and placed this value at $10,781.00, $11,735.00, $10,387.00 and $9,550.00.

The jury was not authorized to fix a value on the property in question, after the taking, at a less sum than that given by any witness. Houston Belt Terminal Ry. Co. v. Lynch, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W. 362; Roberts v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 350 S.W.2d 388.

The award found by the jury was excessive by the sum of $645.00. We conclude, therefore, that the appellees should be allowed to take the lesser sum if they so desire; and, if appellees shall file in this court within 15 days their remittitur of $645.00, being the difference between the $8,905.00 found by the jury to be the value of the remainder, after taking, and $9,550.00 being the least value testified to by the witnesses, as to such value. Such remittitur must also include all interest which has accrued on such $645.00. Failing this remittitur, the trial court judgment will be reversed and remanded. Rule 440, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Houston Belt Terminal Ry. Co. v. Lynch, Tex.Com.App., 221 S.W. 959; Hopson v. Gulf Oil Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 237 S.W.2d 323.

The judgment is affirmed conditionally.


Summaries of

State v. Spears

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
Nov 13, 1963
374 S.W.2d 250 (Tex. Civ. App. 1963)
Case details for

State v. Spears

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. E. M. SPEARS et ux., Appellees

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont

Date published: Nov 13, 1963

Citations

374 S.W.2d 250 (Tex. Civ. App. 1963)

Citing Cases

Rector v. De Arana

"        In a case slightly earlier than the Hendrix case, State v. Spears, 374 S.W.2d 250…

State v. Nesom

00 exceeds the maximum estimate of value of the only witness thereon and there is no other competent proof of…