From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 21, 1994
264 Ga. 634 (Ga. 1994)

Opinion

S94G0541.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 21, 1994.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 211 Ga. App. 567.

Ralph T. Bowden, Jr., Solicitor, Cliff Howard, Jaqueline R. Seabolt, Assistant Solicitors, for appellant.

Rita T. Williams, for appellee.


We granted certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly reversed Smith's misdemeanor conviction because the trial court did not adequately warn him of the dangers of self-representation. Smith was found guilty of simple battery, but not guilty of criminal trespass, and he was sentenced to 12 months probation, a fine, and 32 hours of community service.

Before trial, he invoked his right to appointed counsel, but was rejected, not because of the nature of the charges against him, but because he did not qualify for indigent representation. He then informed the trial court that while he wanted to hire a lawyer, he could not afford to do so even though his financial status precluded the services of the public defender. And, as pointed out by the dissent in the Court of Appeals, he indicated that he clearly understood and wished to avoid the danger of self-representation, Burnett v. State, 182 Ga. App. 539, 541 (1) ( 356 S.E.2d 231) (1987). Accordingly, there was no reason for the trial court to advise him that he had a right to hire counsel, to assure that he had waived that right, and to warn him of the dangers of proceeding without retained counsel.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED NOVEMBER 21, 1994.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 21, 1994
264 Ga. 634 (Ga. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE v. SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 21, 1994

Citations

264 Ga. 634 (Ga. 1994)
452 S.E.2d 90

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

ANDREWS, Judge. The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case having been reversed by the Supreme Court,…

Parks v. McClung

However, our courts have held that a defendant is not entitled to court-appointed counsel unless he is…