From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 8, 2023
No. 2023-UP-359 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2023-UP-359 Appellate Case 2021-000579

11-08-2023

The State, Respondent, v. Donald Dayquan Smith, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2023

Appeal From Florence County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge Michael S. Holt, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., and HEWITT and VERDIN, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 8, 2023
No. 2023-UP-359 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2023)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Donald Dayquan Smith, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 8, 2023

Citations

No. 2023-UP-359 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2023)