From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-136 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-136 Appellate Case 2019-000536

03-23-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Michael Joe Smith, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022

Appeal From Florence County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J, MCDONALD, J, and LOCKEMY, AJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-136 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Michael Joe Smith, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-136 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)