From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 25, 2015
2015-UP-095 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-095

02-25-2015

The State, Respondent, v. John Henry Smith, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-000876

Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Jimmy A. Richardson, II, of Conway, and Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General J. Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

Heard February 12, 2015

Appeal From Horry County Larry B. Hyman, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Jimmy A. Richardson, II, of Conway, and Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General J. Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

John Henry Smith appeals the trial court's refusal to grant a directed verdict of acquittal for armed robbery when the State failed to introduce evidence of a weapon. We affirm.

We hold the trial court did not err in denying Smith's motion for a directed verdict for armed robbery. The armed robbery statute requires that, for a conviction, a robbery must have been committed and a weapon or the representation of a weapon had to be present at the commission of the robbery. See S.C. Code Ann. § 16-11-330(A) (2003); State v. Moore, 374 S.C. 468, 477, 649 S.E.2d 84, 88 (Ct. App. 2007) ("[I]t is the use or alleged use of a deadly weapon that distinguishes armed robbery from robbery"); State v. Dodd, 354 S.C. 13, 17, 579 S.E.2d 331, 333 (Ct. App. 2003) (stating that, for conviction of armed robbery, the state must establish "that a robbery was committed and either . . . (1) that the robber was armed with a deadly weapon or (2) that the robber alleged he was armed with a deadly weapon, either by action or words, while using a representation of a deadly weapon or any object"). Here, Smith stated that he had a gun and he kept his right hand in his pocket throughout the robbery in a manner that appeared awkward under the circumstances. On the facts of this case, the act of keeping his right hand in his pocket for the entirety of the robbery is sufficient evidence of a representation of a deadly weapon for the trial court to deny the motion for a directed verdict and submit the case to the jury.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF AND WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 25, 2015
2015-UP-095 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. John Henry Smith, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 25, 2015

Citations

2015-UP-095 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2015)