State v. Singleton

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. William Arthur Singleton, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

No. 2024-UP-097 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-097 Appellate Case 2021-001248

03-27-2024

The State, Respondent, v. William Arthur Singleton, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, of Greenville, all for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2024.

Appeal From Greenville County Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior

Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, of Greenville, all for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.