From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Siferd

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 11, 2003
789 N.E.2d 237 (Ohio 2003)

Opinion

No. 2003-0106.

Submitted May 14, 2003.

Decided June 11, 2003.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hancock County, No. 5-02-09, 2002-Ohio-6801.

Robert A. Fry, Hancock County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark C. Miller, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, Angie Greene and Jerry McHenry, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.


{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on Proposition of Law No. X is affirmed on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State v. Siferd

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 11, 2003
789 N.E.2d 237 (Ohio 2003)
Case details for

State v. Siferd

Case Details

Full title:The State of Ohio, Appellee v. Siferd, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 11, 2003

Citations

789 N.E.2d 237 (Ohio 2003)
789 N.E.2d 237
2003 Ohio 2765

Citing Cases

State ex rel. New Riegel Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Ohio Sch. Facilities Comm'n

In doing so, we must give effect to the words used, not to delete words or to insert words not used. See…

Keesling v. Beegle

The Ohio Supreme Court granted discretionary review (and affirmed) on a separate issue. State v. Siferd, 99…