From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Shives

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 11, 2015
362 P.3d 1123 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

concluding that trial counsel's performance objectively reasonable despite failure to object to nurse's opinion that lack of observable injury was consistent with rape where trial occurred prior to Tully opinion, and at the time of trial nurse's testimony was not objectionable

Summary of this case from Khalil-Alsalaami v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 108,773.

12-11-2015

STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Kevin Howard SHIVES, Appellant.

Ryan J. Eddinger, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Steven J. Obermeier, senior deputy district attorney, Stephen M. Howe, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.

Decision Without Published Opinion

Affirmed.

Summaries of

State v. Shives

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 11, 2015
362 P.3d 1123 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

concluding that trial counsel's performance objectively reasonable despite failure to object to nurse's opinion that lack of observable injury was consistent with rape where trial occurred prior to Tully opinion, and at the time of trial nurse's testimony was not objectionable

Summary of this case from Khalil-Alsalaami v. State
Case details for

State v. Shives

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Kevin Howard SHIVES, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Dec 11, 2015

Citations

362 P.3d 1123 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Khalil-Alsalaami v. State

We hold the district court findings support its conclusion that trial counsel's failure to object to Nall's…

Cardenas v. State

Our appellate courts have denied similar claims when an appellant argues his or her attorney was ineffective…

2 Citing Cases