From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sergent

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 30, 2015
2015 Ohio 3958 (Ohio 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2015-1093

09-30-2015

State v. Sergent


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING.

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' entry dated June 30, 2015:

"In the context of a jointly-recommended sentence, is the trial court required to make consecutive-sentence findings under R.C. 2929.14(C) in order for its sentence to be authorized by law and thus not appealable?"

The conflict cases are State v. Weese, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2013-CA-61, 2014-Ohio-3267, and State v. Pulliam, 4th Dist. Scioto No. 14CA3609, 2015-Ohio-759.


Summaries of

State v. Sergent

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 30, 2015
2015 Ohio 3958 (Ohio 2015)
Case details for

State v. Sergent

Case Details

Full title:State v. Sergent

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

Citations

2015 Ohio 3958 (Ohio 2015)
143 Ohio St. 3d 1476
38 N.E.3d 898

Citing Cases

State v. Rodriguez

Moreover, one of the pivotal issues on appeal herein; whether trial courts need to make consecutive…

State v. Rice

The Ohio Supreme Court has certified a conflict among the districts and will hear State v. Sergent. See State…