State v. Seldon

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Lamont Seldon, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Appellate Case No. 2019-000592 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2021)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2019-000592 Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-219

06-16-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Lamont Seldon, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia; and Lamont Seldon, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia; and Lamont Seldon, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹ WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.