From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Seabrook

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 31, 2018
2018-UP-040 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-040

01-31-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Terrance Seabrook, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-212388

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2018

Appeal From Beaufort County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Seabrook

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 31, 2018
2018-UP-040 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Seabrook

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Terrance Seabrook, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 31, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-040 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2018)