From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Scoggins

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1930
155 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1930)

Opinion

(Filed 10 December, 1930.)

APPEAL by defendant from Moore, J., at April Term, 1930, of POLK.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

Quinn, Hamrick Harris and J. S. Dockery for defendant.


Criminal prosecutions tried upon indictments charging the defendant (1) with having and keeping in his possession spirituous or vinous liquors for the purpose of sale (C. S., 3379) and with transporting the same (C. S., 3411(b), and (2) with resisting an officer in violation of C. S., 4378.

From an adverse verdict on both indictments, and judgments of eighteen months on the roads on each indictment, to run concurrently, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.


A careful examination of the records reveals no reversible error committed on trial. The cases are simple and involve no new question of law. It would serve no useful purpose to set out the evidence.

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Scoggins

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1930
155 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1930)
Case details for

State v. Scoggins

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. BILL SCOGGINS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1930

Citations

155 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1930)
199 N.C. 821