From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Schwandt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Apr 23, 2014
847 N.W.2d 427 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2013AP2775–CR.

2014-04-23

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Casey D. SCHWANDT, Defendant–Respondent.

He averred that he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his right to counsel, “as I was not advised by the court of the ability of counsel to assist me in my defense.” The circuit court denied Schwandt's motion without a hearing, and after a jury found him guilty as charged, he was convicted and sentenced. Schwandt I, No.2011AP2301, ¶ 15. Because we have already determined that Schwandt made a prima facie case with his initial submissions, 3 we must now consider whether the State proved at the evidentiary hearing, by clear and convincing evidence, that Schwandt had a sufficient understanding at his 1997 plea hearing of the difficulties and disadvantages of proceeding without an attorney. 4 We conclude that the State has met its burden.



Summaries of

State v. Schwandt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Apr 23, 2014
847 N.W.2d 427 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Schwandt

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Casey D. SCHWANDT…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Apr 23, 2014

Citations

847 N.W.2d 427 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
354 Wis. 2d 326
2014 WI App. 63