From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Schroeder

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 27, 1968
438 P.2d 1023 (Or. 1968)

Opinion

Argued March 8, Affirmed March 27, 1968

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

J.J. MURCHISON, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Oscar D. Howlett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Presiding Justice, and SLOAN and DENECKE, Justices.


In this appeal from a conviction by the court after trial without a jury, defendant challenges the validity of the M'Naghten rule. ORS 136.410.

Defendant argues the M'Naghten rule is outmoded and should be replaced by the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code definitions of criminal responsibility. The validity of the M'Naghten rule statute and its application do not require further review by the court. State of Oregon v. Garver, 1950, 190 Or. 291, 225 P.2d 771, 27 ALR2d 105; Leland v. Oregon, 1952, 190 Or. 598, 227 P.2d 785, 343 U.S. 790, 72 S Ct 1002, 96 L ed 1302. The argument made here must be made to the legislature.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Schroeder

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 27, 1968
438 P.2d 1023 (Or. 1968)
Case details for

State v. Schroeder

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD DUANE SCHROEDER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 27, 1968

Citations

438 P.2d 1023 (Or. 1968)
438 P.2d 1023

Citing Cases

State v. Haggblom

ORS 136.390 "When the commission of the act charged as a crime is proved and the defense sought to be…

State v. Bostrom

State v. Garver, 190 Or. 291, 298, 225 P.2d 771, 27 A.L.R.2d 105 (1950); State v. Leland, 190 Or. 598, 638,…