From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Schlee

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 18, 2006
111 Ohio St. 3d 1429 (Ohio 2006)

Opinion

No. 2006-1608.

October 18, 2006.

Lake App. No. 2005-L-105, 2006-Ohio-3208.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals' Judgment Entry filed August 9, 2006:

"Whether the trial court can recast [a]ppellant's Motion For Relief From Judgment as a petition for postconviction relief when it has been unambiguously presented as a Civil Rule 60(B) [motion]."

RESNICK, PFEIFER and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Lehrfeld, Hamilton App. No. C-030390, 2004-Ohio-2277.


Summaries of

State v. Schlee

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 18, 2006
111 Ohio St. 3d 1429 (Ohio 2006)
Case details for

State v. Schlee

Case Details

Full title:State v. Schlee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 18, 2006

Citations

111 Ohio St. 3d 1429 (Ohio 2006)
2006 Ohio 5351

Citing Cases

State v. Campbell

11th Dist. No. 2005-L-105, 2006-Ohio-3208. See State v. Schlee, 111 Ohio St.3d 1429, 2006-Ohio-5351, 855…

State v. Bragg

{¶ 24} We note that this issue; i.e., whether a Civ.R. 60(B) motion may be recast as a petition for…