From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Saylor

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 31, 1999
707 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 98-2066 and 98-2067.

Submitted March 10, 1999.

Decided March 31, 1999.

APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA98-03-053.

John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel, First Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and John M. Holcomb, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Richard E. Saylor, pro se.


The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed in case No. 98-2066.

The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified in case No. 98-2067.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.


I would accept this case and require that the matter be briefed and set for oral argument.


Summaries of

State v. Saylor

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 31, 1999
707 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

State v. Saylor

Case Details

Full title:The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Saylor, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 31, 1999

Citations

707 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio 1999)
707 N.E.2d 508