From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-UP-390 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-390 Appellate Case 2020-000408

11-03-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Carl Saunders, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2021

Appeal From Colleton County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-UP-390 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Saunders

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Carl Saunders, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-390 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)