Opinion
1 CA-CR 23-0264 PRPC
02-06-2024
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. TORRE DAMIO SANDERS, JR., Petitioner.
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Philip D. Garrow Counsel for Respondent Torre Damio Sanders, Jr., Yuma Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2017-154800-002 The Honorable Ronee Korbin Steiner, Judge
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Philip D. Garrow Counsel for Respondent
Torre Damio Sanders, Jr., Yuma Petitioner
Presiding Judge Andrew M. Jacobs, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the following decision.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM
¶1 Petitioner Torre Sanders, Jr. seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Sanders's sixth petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find the petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.