From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Russell

Supreme Court of Idaho
Oct 29, 1982
652 P.2d 203 (Idaho 1982)

Opinion

No. 14153.

June 17, 1982. Rehearing Denied October 29, 1982.

APPEAL FROM FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASSIA COUNTY; GEORGE GRANATA, JR., JUDGE.

Charles Johnson, III, of Idaho Legal Aid Services, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant.

David H. Leroy, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., James F. Wickham, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.


The appellant appeals his automatic commitment to State Hospital South pursuant to I.C. § 18-214. The only issue raised by this appeal is the constitutionality of the automatic commitment procedures of I.C. § 18-214, as measured against the due process and equal protection guarantees found in the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, and Art. 1, §§ 1, 13, and 18 of the Idaho Constitution. The appellant successfully asserted the defense of mental disease or defect in the proceedings below. In light of our decision in In re Downing, 103 Idaho 689, 652 P.2d 193 (1982), the order of commitment is affirmed.

McFADDEN, J., concurs in the result.


Because I believe that there is much in the Court's opinion in this case and the related cases argued contemporaneously, Carter v. State, 103 Idaho 701, 652 P.2d 649 and Downing v. State, 103 Idaho 689, 652 P.2d 193, which is apparently in conflict with the Court's recent opinion in True v. State, 103 Idaho 151, 645 P.2d 891, I am unable to join the Court's opinion, being satisfied only that the result reached therein is correct.


Summaries of

State v. Russell

Supreme Court of Idaho
Oct 29, 1982
652 P.2d 203 (Idaho 1982)
Case details for

State v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jimmy Dale RUSSELL…

Court:Supreme Court of Idaho

Date published: Oct 29, 1982

Citations

652 P.2d 203 (Idaho 1982)
652 P.2d 203

Citing Cases

State Ex. Rel. Collins v. Superior Court

The court found the statute reasonable in great part because it contained a safeguard: the state director of…

Carter v. State, Dept. of Health Welfare

BISTLINE, Justice, concurring in the result. Because I believe that there is much in the Court's opinion in…