From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rush

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One
Jun 8, 1973
495 S.W.2d 714 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 34634.

May 22, 1973. Motion for Rehearing or Hearing before Court En Banc Denied June 8, 1973.

APPEAL FROM THE ST. LOUIS COURT OF CRIMINAL CORRECTION, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, DAVID FITZGIBBONS, J.

Thomas W. Shannon, Pros. Atty., J. Brendan Ryan, Circuit Atty., Ronald Safren, Asst. Circuit Atty., St. Louis, for respondent.

Allen I. Harris, St. Louis, for appellant.


Defendant-surety appeals from the forfeiture of its $2,500 bond. The surety gave the bond to secure Gordon Rush's presence in the St. Louis Court for Criminal Causes to answer a charge of illegally possessing narcotic drugs. Rush failed to appear when required. In due time the forfeiture and this appeal followed.

Defendant-surety contends Rush failed to appear here because he was in custody in Minnesota on a Federal bank robbery charge of which he was later convicted and imprisoned. Defendant-surety's only Point Relied On: "May the State upon being appraised the defendant is in Federal custody proceed to obtain judgment for bond forfeiture without taking any affirmative actions to bring the man back to stand trial." This abstract question fails to state briefly and concisely what action of the court is erroneous and hence preserves nothing for review (Rule 84.04(d), V.A.M.R.) and the appeal will be dismissed, Rule 84.08. The holding in State v. Jones, 491 S.W.2d 241 (Mo. 1973) upholding a similar bond forfeiture shows that dismissing the appeal is not a denial of justice.

Appeal dismissed.

WEIER, Acting C. J., and McMILLIAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Rush

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One
Jun 8, 1973
495 S.W.2d 714 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

State v. Rush

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. GARLAND RUSH, DEFENDANT, AND GROUP…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One

Date published: Jun 8, 1973

Citations

495 S.W.2d 714 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

State v. Matzker

The brief is therefore lacking in the requirements of Rule 84.04(a), (b), (c) and (d), V.A.M.R., and Rule…

State v. Brown

A point which merely alleges error in closing argument preserves nothing for review. State v. Rush, 495…