From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rush

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Sep 19, 2017
536 S.W.3d 749 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

ED 104396

09-19-2017

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Corliss RUSH, Appellant.

Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Corliss Rush appeals from the trial court's entry of judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of attempted statutory rape in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2017).


Summaries of

State v. Rush

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Sep 19, 2017
536 S.W.3d 749 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Rush

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Corliss RUSH, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Sep 19, 2017

Citations

536 S.W.3d 749 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)