State v. Ruff

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Kenny Octavis Ruff, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 27, 2018

Appellate Case No. 2017-000136 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 27, 2018)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-000136 Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-285

06-27-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Kenny Octavis Ruff, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Newberry County
Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.