From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rucks

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Aug 14, 2020
300 So. 3d 837 (La. 2020)

Opinion

No. 2019-KH-00076

08-14-2020

STATE of Louisiana v. Demarius Montreal RUCKS


PER CURIAM:

Writ application denied. See per curiam.

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State v. Rucks

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Aug 14, 2020
300 So. 3d 837 (La. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Rucks

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Demarius Montreal RUCKS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Aug 14, 2020

Citations

300 So. 3d 837 (La. 2020)