From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Roman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 23, 1985
472 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-1594.

July 23, 1985.

Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Robert H. Newman, Judge.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and G. Bart Billbrough, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Chaykin, Karlan Jacobs, and Sharon B. Jacobs, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


The facts in this appeal are indistinguishable from those in State v. Ridenour, 453 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), where we held that the electronic surveillance of certain conversations of a defendant in his home conducted by an undercover police officer equipped with a "body bug" did not violate the fourth amendment which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Pursuant to the recent amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, the rights secured by that provision shall be construed in accordance with the fourth amendment, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. Ridenour.

The order of suppression is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Roman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 23, 1985
472 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Roman

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ENRIQUE VINCENTE ROMAN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 23, 1985

Citations

472 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)