From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rohr

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
May 1, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2011-189246 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-189246 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-174

05-01-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Loudin Rohr, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Jennifer E. Roberts, and Assistant Attorney General J. Walt Whitmire, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Dorchester County

Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Jennifer E. Roberts, and Assistant Attorney General J. Walt Whitmire, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Loudin Rohr appeals his convictions for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature, arguing the trial judge erred in allowing the State to inappropriately bolster the testimony of a child witness. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Kromah, 401 S.C. 340, 362, 737 S.E.2d 490, 501 (2013) (finding error in the admission of improper corroboration testimony may be harmless where there is evidence other than the corroborated testimony, and the error "could not reasonably have affected the result of the trial"); State v. Black, 400 S.C. 10, 27, 732 S.E.2d 880, 890 (2012) ("An appellate court generally will decline to set aside a conviction due to insubstantial errors not affecting the result." (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Rohr

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
May 1, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2011-189246 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Rohr

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Loudin Rohr, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2011-189246 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2013)