From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Roebuck

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 30, 1995
657 So. 2d 1009 (La. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-KH-1127

June 30, 1995

IN RE: Roebuck, Terril; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. "G" Number 326-181; Criminal District Court Div. "I" Number 333-982; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 94KW-0417


Granted for the purpose of transferring the application to the district court for a determination of indigence. If the district court finds that relator is currently indigent, it is ordered to delete only that portion of relator's sentence which provides for a jail term in the event of default of payment of the fine. An indigent may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence. Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1963); State ex rel. Rodriguez v. State, 576 So.2d 518 (La. 1991); State v. Coleman, 576 So.2d 518 (La. 1991).

JCW

PFC

WFM

JLD

HTL

CDK

JPV

JOHNSON, J. not on panel.


Summaries of

State v. Roebuck

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 30, 1995
657 So. 2d 1009 (La. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Roebuck

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. TERRIL ROEBUCK

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 30, 1995

Citations

657 So. 2d 1009 (La. 1995)

Citing Cases

State v. Lee

An indigent defendant cannot be subjected to default time in lieu of payment of a fine, costs or restitution.…

State v. Bridges

An indigent defendant cannot be subjected to default time in lieu of payment of a fine, costs or restitution.…