From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Robertson

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Dec 8, 2015
NO. 2015 KW 1535 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2015 KW 1535

12-08-2015

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. MICHAEL ROBERTSON


In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 07-12-0625. BEFORE: PETTIGREW, HIGGINBOTHAM AND CRAIN, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. We reverse the trial court's ruling granting the subpoena duces tecum. The defendant has failed to establish the "need" for all of the documents requested. Moss v. State, 2005-1963 (La. 4/4/06), 925 So.2d 1185, 1199-1200. To the extent that such a showing can be made, an in-camera inspection of the records is minimally necessary to ensure that such sensitive records include only what is determined to be necessary to develop defendant's defense. See State v. Harper, 2010-356 (La. 11/30/10), 53 So.3d 1263, 1270. Thus, we remand for further proceedings. The writ application is otherwise denied.

WJC

JTP

TMH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Robertson

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Dec 8, 2015
NO. 2015 KW 1535 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. MICHAEL ROBERTSON

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 8, 2015

Citations

NO. 2015 KW 1535 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2015)