From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Riggins

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County
Oct 29, 1993
91 Ohio App. 3d 350 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 2952.

Decided October 29, 1993.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Clark County.

Stephen Schumaker, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Bonnie A. Conrad, for appellant.


The appellant, David Riggins, was convicted of rape after a jury trial in the Clark County Common Pleas Court. His conviction was affirmed by this court. He filed a motion to vacate his conviction because he contended that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly investigate the case against him. The trial court overruled appellant's motion without further explanation.

In his single assignment, the appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion without making necessary findings of fact and conclusions of law. We agree.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law are mandatory under R.C. 2953.21 if the trial court dismisses the petition. State v. Lester (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 51, 70 O.O.2d 150, 322 N.E.2d 656; State v. Mapson (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 217, 219, 1 OBR 240, 242, 438 N.E.2d 910, 912; State ex rel. Brown v. Court (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 46, 23 OBR 122, 491 N.E.2d 303. The assignment is well taken.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

WOLFF and FAIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Riggins

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County
Oct 29, 1993
91 Ohio App. 3d 350 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Riggins

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. RIGGINS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County

Date published: Oct 29, 1993

Citations

91 Ohio App. 3d 350 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993)
632 N.E.2d 922

Citing Cases

STATE v. SAPP

At times, we have reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded the cause for the issuance of findings of…

State v. McMullen

{¶ 25} Other courts simply have found that the trial court's failure to make findings of fact and conclusions…