From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rider

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 29, 2008
200 P.3d 566 (Or. 2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

concluding that the defendant's consent was the unattenuated product of the unlawful stop because the state advanced no argument that some fact or circumstance severed the causal connection between the stop and the defendant's consent

Summary of this case from State v. Maciel-Figueroa
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

Nos. (A128863)(S055827).

December 29, 2008.

Appeal from the 216 Or App 308.

Petitions for Review Dismissed.

Upon consideration by the court. It is ordered that plaintiff's petition for review is dismissed as improvidently allowed ( 345 Or 94).

Summaries of

State v. Rider

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 29, 2008
200 P.3d 566 (Or. 2008)

concluding that the defendant's consent was the unattenuated product of the unlawful stop because the state advanced no argument that some fact or circumstance severed the causal connection between the stop and the defendant's consent

Summary of this case from State v. Maciel-Figueroa

concluding that the defendant's consent was the unattenuated product of the unlawful stop because the state advanced no argument that some fact or circumstance severed the causal connection between the stop and the defendant's consent

Summary of this case from State v. Norton

concluding that defendant was stopped when officer wrote down identifying information and instructed another officer to run a warrant check

Summary of this case from State v. Khoshnaw
Case details for

State v. Rider

Case Details

Full title:State v. Rider, Travis Alan

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 29, 2008

Citations

200 P.3d 566 (Or. 2008)
200 P.3d 566

Citing Cases

State v. Khoshnaw

The court went on to state, however, that "because I have made the factual finding that the defendant was not…

State v. Zaccone

On appeal, defendant assigns error to the denial of his suppression motion, largely renewing his arguments…

12 Citing Cases